yes to what artguy says - there needs to be a two-state solution. hard long way to figure out the necessary terms and solutions of that, though...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposals_ ... nian_state
and doreen, what jack is saying regarding the bias of most websites on that topic is exactly what i was trying to tell you. if you find some info that seems interesting to you, check out the "about" page and research on who's running the site, as jack suggests. the lopsidedness of that site 'if americans knew', for instance, that you linked to and where you got info from, was pretty obvious right from the first page already, and fast research on who's running it provided more info pretty quickly (s-t already gave you the link and details)....
like jack, i consider wiki a pretty good source, especially when you follow some of the discussion in the talk sections. there are many different people working on the articles which help balancing out a lot of the lopsided parts.
...someone (i can't remember who it was) in this thread said earlier, that s/he felt that as soon as a someone expressed any sympathy for the palestinians, s/he would be considered antimsemitic or at least be "against jews".
which i find an interesting remark since my experience is the complete opposite - it is so commonly pc and en vogue to bristle at israel and regard the palestinians as mere victims, that any attempt to balance out and adjust some of the uninformed opinions by providing some additional info is considered right-wing and imperialistic and demagogic... or just being ignored.
which is a huge part of the problem in any discussion about this topic - most people choose to have an opinion about it, but do not bother to get the basic info about it, let alone take on the effort to get a balanced picture by gathering info from various sides to get beyond the traps of bias...