doreen peri wrote:Bush should have been impeached years ago.
I think a lot more people would agree with that position, yes, beyond doubt, I think there were at least reasonable grounds to bring an impeachment hearing against Bush.
I don't think anyone is denying Bush's misdeeds, but... this is where it gets interesting, I do think that a lot of people are denying their own misdeeds.
It's easy to blame Bush for all the sins in the world right now, but a lot harder for many people to accept responsability for their own sins.
That's scapegoating, and it's what leads to many of the other sins in the world, with I think 1930's Germany as the greatest example of scapegoating gone wrong.
I touched on this in one of my other posts, when I talked about the straight jacket of modern society too, and the fact is that this thread is a prime example of the politically correct double speak that is actually damaging the next generation, by burying the truth, under an avalanche of PC talk.
Repeatedly, in this thread, if someone holds a divergent opinion, they are a "Neo-con" or "Bush lover", despite everyone indicating they quite clearly aren't.
It's like those conversations, where two people have a differing opinion on immigration, and one turns to the other, and calls him a "racist" because his view isn't the same as the others.
Or you're "homophobic" because you wanted Mickey Rourke to get an oscar, rather than Sean Penn, for his part in Milk.
It's very offensive talk, and deliberately dishonest.
I abhor it.
& then you have the statute of limitations, for example, in Canada, the period is six months from the date of the offense which includes thefts under $5000.
Thus, for instance, a Canadian can be charged only with an "indecent act" within six months of the time of offense, unless both the Crown and the defense agree.
How long do you chase the past for?
Where do we stop?
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, William Henry Harrison, John Tyler, James K. Polk, Zachary Taylor, Andrew Johnson, and Ulysses S. Grant all owned slaves.
Should we dig them all up, and prosecute them?
Theodore Roosevelt?
Well what can I say?
Here is a man who in The Winning of the West (1889–1896), declared there was a racial struggle between "civilization" (white, especially Germanic peoples) and savagery (of people of color, i.e., Native American Indians).
An obvious racist, so let's dig him up too!
Woodrow Wilson?
Well, there's already a thread on him, had we shot him, would there have been a World War 2?
Let's dig him up!
Herbert Hoover?
Words speak for themselves...
"We in America today are nearer to the final triumph over poverty than ever before in the history of any land."
Within months, the Stock Market Crash of 1929 occurred, and the nation's economy spiraled downward into what became known as the Great Depression.
Another one to put before the firing squad!
Richard Nixon?
Well, he got off light, in '74, so we should drag him back for further retribution.
And while we're lining up them Presidents, let's not forget, Carter, Regean, Bush sr, and Clinton!
Not a Saint amongst them!
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Bush deserves a Presidential pardon, a pat on the back, and that we should all forget what happened.
As stilltrucking points out, there are still many ongoing congressional investigations into Bush and Chenney, so who knows yet, what the future will bring.
But it is important not to get to focused on the past, and not to end up just scapegoating, instead of taking responsability for our own actions, and that's what a lot of people are doing.
If we can blame the jews, I mean Nazis, sorry, I meant 12 foot lizard people, ooops, the Freemasons, I mean Bush (damn, got it at last!), for everything, then we don't have to worry about what we did, or what we're doing today.
When it reaches that stage it just becomes a negative thing.
No one in this thread is saying that Bush is a jolly good fellow, or that we should all just forget what he did, but I think some people are seeing a little more of the shading in the picture, than others, and saying this should be about healing America, not just a hate party.