Posted: March 8th, 2009, 1:00 am
That would probably do more good, acheive more, and hurt more.
Post your poetry, artwork, photography, & music.
https://www.studioeight.tv/phpbb/


Yeahbut... it remains unclear to many of us if either election victory was legit, particularly 2000. And even if you get past that there was that little matter of Bush and Friends lying their asses off to get us into an unnecessary war, which basically "got their foot in the door"-- don't change horses in wartime and all that.Yes, Bush was an odious man, and he did a lot of things that are quite inexcusable, but as I hinted above, the Bush family has been notorious for over 100 years, so it's not like people weren't forewarned, and Bush was re-elected, in 2004, so it's not like, having made an initial "mistake", America didn't do it again... Like I said, people get the President they deserve.
What sort of opposition could have realistically beaten them, given the magnitude of their lies and circumstance? What kind of an argument is that?Even those that voted "against" him can't exactly claim to have clean hands, I mean, with his record, what sort of opposition was needed to beat him in 2004?
I don't consider myself a failure, but I fail to understand what this has to do with anything. Seriously.How many people, between 2000 and 2004, drove home in their GM car, fuelled on Exxon gas, paid for from their Bank of America account, to their home, got inside, openned the FedEx parcel that had arrived, checked the answer phone, on their AT & T line, cracked open a Budweiser, turned on their General Electric light bulb, switched on their TV, watched a Time Warner show, or a Disney DVD, before turning on their computer, with it's Microsoft operating system, and coming online to bitch about Bush?... Because everyone who did one, or more, of the things above, contributed to Bush's campaign. That's a lot of people to arrest...
Sorry, but the much vilified "PC", as you're spinning it here, is not a legitimate hiding place to cover for specific and obvious high crimes....touched on this in one of my other posts, when I talked about the straight jacket of modern society too, and the fact is that this thread is a prime example of the politically correct double speak that is actually damaging the next generation, by burying the truth, under an avalanche of PC talk.
Huh?George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, William Henry Harrison, John Tyler, James K. Polk, Zachary Taylor, Andrew Johnson, and Ulysses S. Grant all owned slaves. Should we dig them all up, and prosecute them?
286,000 for ongoing investigations into the bush admistration. (0.12 seconds
Yawn, so what's yoiur problem sonny?Tony C, what the hell's wrong with you?
Tell ya what , I'll debate how I wish and I'll allow you to do the same. (that's why they call it "debate")Learn how to debate, would you?
Oh cry me a fucking river, details, details...who cares?You waste no time pinning "Bush supporter" labels on your challengers and then turn around and deny it. What a joke.
Uh huh , sure...you're way above that type of behaviorInteresting discussion, though a little too bloated for my taste by too many stretches where you're all just basically blowing smoke up each other's asses